01
0 fabricated facts in the tested sample
Across 21 tested scenarios and 105+ generated narratives.
Report writing for law enforcement
Write the report.
Keep the facts close.
LeoPen is police report-writing software for law enforcement. You enter notes in your own words, review the working narrative, and see what made it in and what may still be missing.
Built by a former state trooper who wrote eight crash reports a day.
In plain terms
You provide the facts.
LeoPen prepares the draft.
The officer reviews every word before anything moves forward. LeoPen does not decide what happened, what charge applies, or when a report is ready to submit.
- 01You provide
Notes in your own words.
Type the observations, statements, timing, actions, and outcomes you can support. No special format is required.
- 02LeoPen prepares
A working draft.
LeoPen organizes the details you entered into a clear narrative and keeps the result labeled for review.
- 03You review
The facts, wording, and gaps.
Compare the draft with your notes, answer any missing-detail prompts, and decide what moves forward.
The boundary
LeoPen prepares a working draft from officer-provided text. It does not process body-camera video or audio, make charging decisions, or submit a report to an RMS.
Why LeoPen exists
“I know what it feels like to write a use-of-force report at 4 a.m., knowing every sentence may later be scrutinized in court.”
LeoPen started with the hours, responsibility, and outdated processes behind police reports — not with a general AI product looking for a market.
Read the founder storyThe thing everyone asks first
Built and tested to keep unsupported facts out.
Most AI writing tools rely on a prompt asking the model not to invent things. LeoPen adds enforcement around the model. A written rule set forbids adding any fact the officer did not supply — or strengthening one they did. A separate check runs after the draft is written and removes unsupported language before it reaches the officer. Then a fact checker compares the draft with the officer's own words and shows which facts made it in.
02
4 of 4
Prompt-injection attempts hidden inside officer notes were excluded.
03
Repeatable in current tests
Generation runs at a fixed setting. In current tests, the same supplied facts produced the same draft.
04
Every draft is versioned and attributed
LeoPen-generated and officer-edited text stay identified, with a forced re-review after a manual edit.
Internal test results describe the tested sample. They are not an accuracy guarantee.
What it does
Four tools. One report you can defend.
A clean report isn't the same as a defensible one. LeoPen keeps the draft connected to the facts and sources behind it.
01
Report drafting
You provide the notes. LeoPen organizes them into a professional working draft without filling in facts you left out.
02Fact and instruction review
Compare the draft with your original notes and review documented details beside Florida jury instructions.
03Agency policy sources
Ask a question about your agency policy, then open the document and page behind the answer.
04Warrant preparation
Organize the request, target, facts, timing, source reliability, nexus, and particularity for review.
From scene to source
From your notes to the source behind them.
The officer's facts stay connected as the draft moves through review.
- 01
Type your notes
Enter observations, statements, timing, actions, and other details you can support.
- 02
Review the draft
Correct the wording and confirm the narrative says what you meant.
- 03
Check the facts
See which details made it into the draft and which ones may still be missing.
- 04
Open the source
Return to the Florida jury instruction or agency policy page behind the review.
Coverage
Works on the reports a camera never saw.
LeoPen starts from what the officer tells it, not from a recording. That means it works on delayed reports, follow-ups, phone-in complaints, detective work, jail incidents, and every observation an officer made but never said out loud on scene. It works the same whether the agency runs body cameras or not.
Most of what ends up in a narrative was never narrated aloud.
Security belongs in the architecture.
Review deployment, identity, data flow, access, retention, providers, evidence, and responsibilities for the proposed pilot.
For agency evaluators
Bring a written method to the pilot.
Use practical guides and printable tools to define what the agency will test, how reviewers will record findings, and what evidence supports the final decision.
01
Plan an AI report-writing pilot
Define scope, safeguards, scenarios, evidence, and a written decision gate before expanding use.
Open resource 02Score the pilot
Track time, edits, unsupported statements, omissions, supervisor returns, reliability, and feedback.
Open resource 03Plan the audit trail
Decide which people, sources, versions, edits, approvals, and exports the agency needs to reconstruct.
Open resourceBefore a pilot
Straight answers.
What is LeoPen?
LeoPen is report-writing and review software for police officers. It turns officer-provided notes into a working draft, compares that draft with the original facts, and connects the review to Florida jury instructions and agency policy sources.
Can reviewers inspect the source material?
Yes. Florida jury-instruction and agency-policy tools link back to the retained document and relevant page so a reviewer can read the underlying language directly.
How does the draft get into our RMS today?
Officers review the draft in LeoPen, then copy or download it for the agency’s current report process. Direct RMS integration is planned; it is not available today.
How does an agency evaluate deployment and security?
A pilot should document the exact hosting, identity, providers, data flow, retention, administrative access, evidence, and responsibility split before agency data is used.